Printer friendly version 
 Square Dance Resource Net  (Home)ArticlesCallers and CuersClubsEventsResourcesChoreographyMusicLyricsCeder Chest Definition BooksCeder Square Dance System  (CSDS)Square Rotation Program  (SQROT)Vic Ceder - Square Dance CallerDefinitions of square dance calls and conceptsMore square dance DefinitionsLists of square dance calls and conceptsFrequently Asked QuestionsSquare dance linksLos Olivos Honey BeesBande DéssineesChocolate BarsBeanie BabiesPokémon Trading CardsSend us feedback
FAQs
 
FAQs
 

Definitions ==> Calls and Concepts

Track {n}
Calls are often called from starting formations other than what is specified in the definition. The starting formations in the definition is often regarded only as a suggested standard starting formation.

Do you think a Track 0 is legal from any of these starting formations?
Starting DPT
parallel 2 faced lines
parallel RH/LH waves
RH/LH columns
A tandem trade can be called from any of the above. A Track 0 has no extend, so it dosn't matter that we can't extend when starting from some of the above formations.

Even more evil: how about Track 1 from parallel waves. It would end in a 3/4 tag. Or Track 2 from RH/HL columns, ending in a tidal column! Is any of this legal (not necessarily moral)?

My 'gestalt' of the call would allow Track 0 to be called from Tandem Couples (Starting DPT or Parallel 2FL), but not from Mini-Wave Boxes (Waves or Columns). Personally, I wouldn't call it from any of those formations. I would be annoyed if a caller called Track (n) from a Mini-Wave Box formation.

As for your evil suggestions, I don't particularly care for them.

Ceder Chest Definition of Track n


last modified: 22-April-2008   
ID: 416
  
  
  

full URL